Donate Now ! website is not supported by any corporate or political parties as many other online portals are, neither do we have any investment from businesses. We believe in speaking the truth and bringing out the caste realities which are kept hidden by mainstream media. We work on bringing out Dalit-Bahujans history and culture which have been sidelined till now.

 Subscribe      Donate   

Help us in our endeavour to fight against caste discrimination, stand for equality and struggle for establishing the ideology of Dr. B.R.Ambedkar and many other Dalit-Bahujan ideals.

West Bengal: Library Science Student Faces Caste-Based Harassment at Jadavpur University | The Ambedkarite Today

An MA second year student of the Library Science Department uploaded a status from his Facebook account at 27 may night complaining of the harassment and negligence he has been facing under his dissertation guide, Prof. Udayan Bhattacharya.

 Library Science Student Faces Caste-Based Harassment at Jadavpur University
Student unions protests outside of university

Raja Manna, a student belonging to the Tapasili community believes his guide behaved with him in such a manner for caste-based reasons.

Raja Manna claims that the harassment began in January this year when he was not allowed to choose an optional paper of his choice for. Regarding optional/elective papers the CBCS system states the following:

 Elective Courses/Activities: These are part of Co and Extra-curricular Activities and each student must opt for a minimum 4 to 8 credits in entire duration of the program. i. The identified MOOC’s subjects or any other On-line courses offered by the recognized accredited University enlisted by the Department / School. ii. The approved Co and Extra-curricular activities as defined by the Department / School / University.’

Of the 19 students in his class, Raja Manna was the only student who was not allowed to select an optional paper of his choice. Following this, Raja Manna had written to the Dean of Arts complaining of the discrimination he was facing in his department. The Dean had pledged to solve the issue.

Prof. Udayan Bhattacharya, the main accused in Raja Manna’s Facebook,

was the erstwhile Library Science Head of Department (HoD). Raja Manna claims that the complaint he had made to the Dean of Arts had provoked Udayan Bhattacharya and that the HoD had started threatening Raja Manna in April, saying things like ‘We’ll teach you a lesson for complaining to the Dean of Arts.

Raja Manna claims he was ill at that point of time and had not been regularly attending University. After returning for a presentation Raja Manna claims that he was continuously disturbed during his presentation by the erstwhile. HoD.

Frustrated to an extreme, Raja Manna wrote another letter to Vice-Chancellor Suranjan Das, complaining of the regular discrimination. Two letters were submitted against Raja Manna after this, both coming from PhD scholars of his department.

Arijit Das and Arindam Sarkar, both pursuing a Ph.D. under Prof. Udayan Bhattacharya had written to the Vice-Chancellor stating that the claims Raja Manna was making were false.

Raja Manna further claims that the Vice-Chancellor insisted him to continue his dissertation under Prof. Udayan Bhattacharya to avoid further harassment when Raja Manna demanded the formation of a fact-finding committee.

After publishing the Facebook post, Raja Manna claims that he was further harassed by the Ph.D. scholars Arijit Das and Arindam Sarkar who took jibes at him for making the Facebook post.

In his Facebook post, Raja Manna had called for a General Body Meeting in the Arts Faculty of Jadavpur Universtiy. The General Body resolved to submit a deputation to the Executive Council meeting on the 28th of May. The resolution of the EC on this matter is yet to be known.


A Case of Harassment of Dalit Student in Jadavpur University: Srijan Dutta

“The value of a man was reduced to his immediate identity and nearest possibility.”

The line quoted above is from Dalit PhD scholar Rohith Vemula’s ‘last’ letter, discovered after he was found hanging in his hostel room in January 2016. The letter had exposed how caste-based discrimination is used as a medium of oppression against Dalits and other minorities. Casteism serves both as an ideology and as a means for exploitation by the upper castes and upper classes of the Indian society.

Recently, a complaint has been made by a second year Masters student of the Department of Library and Information Science in one of the hotbeds of Bengal student politics, Jadavpur University. Jadavpur Uiversity is also a premier institution of higher learning, with a well deserved reputation.  Raja Manna, a student belonging to the ‘Scheduled Caste’ category, has revealed that he has been facing a lot of harassment and discrimination at the hands of his dissertation guide, Prof. Udayan Bhattacharya, an upper caste Brahmin.

Clearly, these are not isolated instances. We have also recently heard of Payel Tadvi, a junior doctor at BYL Nair Hospital in Mumbai, who was found dead in her hostel room on 22 May 2019. She belonged to a Muslim tribal community and complained of severe caste discrimination and harassment by three of her Hindu upper caste colleagues.

Rohith Vemula’s letter had given us a lot to reflect upon. It explained the deep-seated malaise the Indian society suffers from: widespread inequality, the marginal representation of ‘lower’ castes in education and employment, upper caste bias against reservation and use of caste-based violence for silencing dissenters. The grip of Brahminical hegemony over the entire society is so tight that a human being is degraded to a mere identity and on the basis of that identity one’s upward mobility is restricted for good. The individual has to live in conformity with the implications of one’s ascribed social position or otherwise face immense humiliation at the hands of the upper castes.

Raja Manna’s ordeals began in January this year, when he was deprived of his right to choose an optional paper granted under the CBCS system. Out of 19 students in his class, Manna alone was not allowed to choose the paper and was clear evidence that  he was targeted by his professor. There are reasons to believe that this was related to his being dalit as he often had to face ridicule that invoked his caste background. Since the perpetrator himself was the HoD at that time, Raja reached out to the Dean of Arts through a letter demanding that the issue be resolved. The Dean reassured him that the issue would be addressed immediately but no action was initiated by him. Meanwhile, Raja Manna’s letter to the Dean of Arts had enraged the accused, who alleged started threatening him in April. According to Manna, Prof. Bhattacharya tried to intimidate him by threatening to teach him a lesson for complaining to the Dean of Arts and ruining his career by not giving him proper marks.

Raja Manna suffers from serious health problems and because of that he had not been coming to the university regularly for some time. After resuming attending his classes daily, he was troubled again while giving a presentation in front of the former HoD, Prof. Bhattacharya.

As the frequency of such incidents increased to a matter of routine occurrence, Raja Manna wrote another complaint letter, this time to the Vice-chancellor of the university, Prof. Suranjan Das. However, Arijit Das and Arindam Sarkar, two research scholars of the erstwhile HoD, also wrote two letters describing Manna’s claims to be false. The Vice-chancellor took no notice of Raja’s first complaint and he wrote two more letters seeking justice.

In the last week of May, Raja Manna along with a few student activists of the campus visited the Vice-chancellor’s office. But, instead of changing his dissertation guide, the VC insisted that hecontinue to work under the accused professor. Moreover, the VC and the Dean of Arts requested Manna not to pursue his demand for the formation of an investigation committee. According to the student activists present, excuses such as “Raja’s future will be ruined,” or “lack of trust on part of the student for his professors” and “student-teacher relationship is not an antagonistic one” were put forward by the authorities to discard the demand for the formation of an investigation committee.

A meeting of the Executive Council of the university took place on 28 May, following which the authorities have stated that an investigation committee will be formed by the SC/ST Cell. The appointment of a new dissertation guide is still on hold and will be addressed in a meeting of the Board of Studies of the Library and Information Science department.

Although all student organisations in the university have rallied behind Raja, the TMCP and the SFI, student wings of the present and former ruling parties in West Bengal, have remained passive so far. The SFI leadership has refused to intervene despite having a majority in the Arts Faculty Students Union.

Those who have taken up the cudgels on Raja’s behalf point out that such instances of caste-based discrimination in isolation has restricted us from understanding the upper caste Brahminical hegemony over the larger society. Considering these cases to be scattered issues of caste-based discrimination has facilitated their normalisation in the society. Such issues of injustice often escalate to unfortunate cases like the ‘institutional murder’ of Rohith Vemula and will continue to do so if the students do not raise their voice against caste discrimination in educational institutions.

Raja Manna has shown remarkable courage by disclosing over social media the details of the kind of discrimination he faced at the hands of his professor. From being socially isolated in the department to getting taunted by PhD scholars, Raja went through a lot of mental harassment.His professor did not miss a chance to ridicule him in class, whether the reason was Manna’s hairstyle or his academic performance. Prof. Bhattacharya always managed to connect everything to Raja’s caste identity. The accused allegedly threatened Raja that he would “break his back” after he had filed the complaint. According to the victim, Arijit and Arindam, the two PhD scholars had also remarked that they would strip Manna during his examination and conduct a search on him. On 8 June, a MPhil student of the same department unexpectedly visited Raja Manna’s house and tried to convince his mother that demanding a probe would turn out to be detrimental for Raja’s career. But, all this trauma and intimidation could not suppress him because of his determination to fight back against caste-based discrimination. Amidst all the uncertainty that lies ahead regarding his future, Raja Manna waits in hope for justice and wants others to join the fight.


[ Get the Top Story that matters from The Ambedkarite Today on your inbox. Click this link and hit 'Click to Subscribe'. Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter ]

Support Our Work!!

If you enjoyed this article, consider making a donation to help us produce more like it. The Ambedkarite Today was founded in 2018 to tell the stories of how government really works for—and how to make it work better. Help us tell more of the stories that matter from voices that too often remain unheard. As a nonprofit, we rely on support from readers like you.